Clinical process benchmarks

Benchmarked against comparable hospitals in your peer group – regionally, or Europe-wide with an extended set of metrics.

82%

OR utilisation

Is that a good number?

On its own it says nothing. Only a comparison gives it meaning.

It only becomes comparable with a shared definition.

Every event comes automatically from your systems – same definition, same data basis, same moment of capture. That is what turns noise into a reliable comparison with genuinely similar hospitals.

Where you stand – metric by metric.

Your figures against an anonymised peer group of comparable hospitals.

OR capacity utilisation Top third
On-time first case Room to improve
Turnover times Out in front
Emergencies Mid-field
Cancelled procedures Solid
Forecast accuracy Very good

The same process database that drives your assistants also measures how well your workflows run. Because every event is captured automatically from your systems, the metrics share one definition – which is what makes them comparable across hospitals in the first place.

Against our model

Our process model knows the expected course of a procedure, a ward and an emergency department. Your real times are set against it, so deviations surface as specific bottlenecks rather than as averages.

Your time Expected
Turnover time
First case start
Induction

Against other sqior hospitals

You also compare yourself, anonymously, against a peer group of other hospitals running sqior – same definitions, same data basis, same moment of capture.

You Peer group
OR utilisation
Turnover times
Emergencies

Where does your hospital stand?

Sign up for the benchmark programme and receive regular analyses for the areas that matter to you.

Sign up now